• Our Motto

    "You want to have an intelligent conversation? Do what I do: Talk to yourself. Trust me, it's the only way." --Torch Song Trilogy
  • Archives

CRS Recommendation: Foreign Holdings of Public Debt

A Stitch in Haste recommends the following report from the Congressional Research Service:

Foreign Holdings of Federal Debt
Summary:
Foreign investment in federal debt has grown in recent years, prompting questions on the location of the foreign holders and how much debt they hold. …[D]uring the past four years, foreign holdings of the public debt have increased more than the total privately held debt has increased. Foreign holdings of debt increased by $856.5 billion to nearly $1.9 trillion from December 2000 to December 2004.

The report is 5 pages — a very quick read. Some hasty stitches:

–For the first time in recent years, foreign individuals and governments now hold a majority of our national debt — 51.6% to be precise.

–The top three foreign holders of federal debt, by country, are Japan, Mainland China and the U.K. These rankings are the same as five years ago, but these three nations’ share of total foreign holdings are increasing. Mainland China’s share, for example, has more than doubled, from 6.0% to 12.2%.

–Roughly 60% of all foreign holdings of federal debt are held by official investors (i.e., governments), while 40% is held by private foreigners.

–Mainland China owns five times as much federal debt as OPEC.

–None of these numbers reflect the fraudulent Social Security “trust fund,” which is, for now, “non-public” debt.

My take on foreign holdings of debt is fairly straightforward. Historically speaking, foreigners — especially Asian governments and institutions — have been rotten investors who show an irrational preference for overpriced “trophy” properties and holdings. And what better trophy is there for inflated foreign egos — and state propaganda — than “owning” the United States Government?

Whatever. If China’s Communists and other Asian investors want to loan our government money at laughably low interest rates, then I say let them. And when interest rates rise, which they will, these investors will lose their shirts, just like they always do.

On the other hand, our own hack politicians tend to be as least as foolish as foreigners, and if those in Washington believe that this willingness of foreigners to subsidize our own fiscal recklessness can continue ad infinitum, then we are in for a very rude awakening.

The real problem is not with our current account deficit (i.e., our “trade deficit”), but with its root cause, namely the federal budget deficit. The higher the deficit, by definition the more public debt we need to issue, and the more likely that the new debt will be bought by foreigners.

Clean up our own fiscal house first, and the rest of the global neighborhood will take care of itself.

Previous CRS Recommendations:
China’s Internet Censorship
Summary of Rumsfeld v. FAIR

Similar Posts:

3 Responses to “CRS Recommendation: Foreign Holdings of Public Debt”

  1. Foreign holdings of debt increased by $856.5 billion to nearly $1.9 trillion from December 2000 to December 2004.

    –For the first time in recent years, foreign individuals and governments now hold a majority of our national debt — 51.6% to be precise.

    Wow! That means the debt shrunk to $3.68 trillion. And I thought it was about $8 trillion.

    Things are in better shape than I thought.

    [Kip replies: The report concurs and lists "Total Public Debt Held by Private Investors" as $3.667.1 trillion as of December 2004. But December 2004 was 11 months ago. The $8.1 trillion figure you have seen includes the fraudulent Social Security "trust fund," which is not a trust fund at all but simply "non-public" federal debt. That component of the national debt will start converting from non-public to public startting around 2017.]

  2. Oops, missed the part separating public debt from money owed to trust funds. Things are exactly as I thought.

    I tend to agree with Bernanke that there is a glut of savings (or a dearth of investment)outside the US, and that is what drives foreign governments to invest heavily in US treasury securities – even when they were yielding squat.

  3. Agreed! The trade deficit is irrelevant. Isn't trade by definition automatically an "equal" exchange????

    You give me a Honda Civic and I'll give you $20,000 (which is really printed paper).

    Sounds like a good deal to me.

Entire contents © Glenchrist Enterprises LLC. All rights reserved.