Bill Gates: Sage or Fool?
Posted on April 20th, 2006 by Kip
It is my belief that industry and government around the world should work even more closely to protect the privacy and security of Internet users, and promote the exchange of ideas, while respecting legitimate government considerations.
This was said, of course, during a meeting with China’s Communist dictators, with whom Gates has, thus far, been an unapologetic collaborator.
So the question now becomes: What are “legitimate” government considerations deserving of “respect”?
Is, for example, wholesale censorship of the Internet, complete with political prisoners, a “legitimate government consideration”?
Just wondering.
Similar Posts:
- “China is Still a Dictatorship” Fact of the Day
- “China is Still a Dictatorship” Fact of the Day
- Is Bill Gates Betraying His Own Trust?
- A Man’s Home is His Castle…
- Another “Schoolhouse Gate” Lawsuit
Filed under: Uncategorized
I suspect he realizes that the government may have found the one area where it's more competent than even Microsoft. That's a low standard, of course, which does everything but beg for government intervention. Just about every other company could achieve more without government intervention. Steve Jobs and Linus Torvalds might be able to show a different perspective, if Gates would just listen.
Rules vs. Standards
Kip's post on Bill Gates is written in a context totally unrelated to jurisprudence, and yet, it best illustrates why so many of us hate so-called balancing tests. Just about anything can become a "legitimate" interest.
Steve Jobs?? I wasn't aware that Apple stopped doing business with China.