<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Gates: Sage or Fool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2006/04/bill-gates-sage-or-fool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2006/04/bill-gates-sage-or-fool/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2006/04/bill-gates-sage-or-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=2234#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>Steve Jobs?? I wasn&#039;t aware that Apple stopped doing business with China.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs?? I wasn't aware that Apple stopped doing business with China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crime &#38; Federalism</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2006/04/bill-gates-sage-or-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Crime &#38; Federalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=2234#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rules vs. Standards&lt;/strong&gt;

Kip&#039;s post on Bill Gates is written in a context totally unrelated to jurisprudence, and yet, it best illustrates why so many of us hate so-called balancing tests.  Just about anything can become a &quot;legitimate&quot; interest.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rules vs. Standards</strong></p>
<p>Kip's post on Bill Gates is written in a context totally unrelated to jurisprudence, and yet, it best illustrates why so many of us hate so-called balancing tests.  Just about anything can become a "legitimate" interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2006/04/bill-gates-sage-or-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=2234#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>I suspect he realizes that the government may have found the one area where it&#039;s more competent than even Microsoft.  That&#039;s a low standard, of course, which does everything but beg for government intervention.  Just about every other company could achieve more without government intervention.  Steve Jobs and Linus Torvalds might be able to show a different perspective, if Gates would just listen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect he realizes that the government may have found the one area where it's more competent than even Microsoft.  That's a low standard, of course, which does everything but beg for government intervention.  Just about every other company could achieve more without government intervention.  Steve Jobs and Linus Torvalds might be able to show a different perspective, if Gates would just listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

