Amazon.com Widgets Activist Legislator Too Activist to Research the Constitutionality of His Own Bill | A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine … But Haste Makes Waste

A collection of real-world libertarian, individualist and laissez-faire rants on law, economics, politics, culture and other current events
by an average, everyday lawyer & investment banker and part-time pop scholar.


A Stitch in Haste header image 4

Activist Legislator Too Activist to Research the Constitutionality of His Own Bill

February 5th, 2008 · No Comments

Department of Moaning and Sighing:

People filing for public office would also have to submit to drug testing under a proposal pitched by a [South Carolina] state senator.

Senate Republican Leader Harvey Peeler filed his bill a day after news broke that former state Treasurer Thomas Ravenel had been indicted on a federal cocaine conspiracy charge.

No.

Of course, Chandler v. Miller, 520 U.S. 305 (1997), only expressly forbids a requirement, such as this moron’s chest-thumping nonsense, that candidates pass a drug test. It does not directly address requiring candidates only to take a drug test — and publishing the results for voters to do with as they see fit. Mark my words: someone, somewhere, someday will propose exactly that. (I think it clear, however, that the Court’s reasoning would extend to any drug testing, even non-disqualifying regimes.)

Tags: Uncategorized


Related Posts
(Automatically Generated)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/activist-legislator-too-activist-to-research-the-constitutionality-of-his-own-bill/trackback/



--> Return to Main Page <--