<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Keep Forgetting, So I Keep Reminding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Comer</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/comment-page-1/#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Comer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=3912#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>&quot;Meanwhile, Clinton herself today penned a missive explaining why she&#039;s just so fabulous for gays and cites all the wonderful things -- all seven of them -- that she&#039;s done for us.&quot;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Too little. Too Late.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Meanwhile, Clinton herself today penned a missive explaining why she's just so fabulous for gays and cites all the wonderful things &#8212; all seven of them &#8212; that she's done for us."</p>
<p>Too little. Too Late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/comment-page-1/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=3912#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Moreover, any version of the MREA is dead without a Democratic president.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;That hasn&#039;t stopped the Democrats from moving forward with ENDA.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><br />
<blockquote>Moreover, any version of the MREA is dead without a Democratic president.</p></blockquote>
<p></i>That hasn't stopped the Democrats from moving forward with ENDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/comment-page-1/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=3912#comment-5866</guid>
		<description>Obama (the only other male senator still running in the Dem primaries). I make no representations on his record on gay rights; I would simply note that he is not associated with the triangulation strategy that resulted in DOMA.  Personally, gay rights is low on my totem pole of issues at this juncture.  He has a tendency to interject pro-gay statements in unusual settings and his past work in civil rights indicates he will be very careful about his judicial nominees.    &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Of course, all that being said, Obama is no libertarian and you are unlikely to support him.  I was making a comment about the interest gay Democratic voters have in him, and lingering suspicions from the Clinton era.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; As an aside, although I will not be voting for Clinton in the primary, I will be supporting her if she is the Democratic nominee.  The fact that Clinton has not sponsored legislation to repeal DODT is not something I am especially concerned about.  There were only two realistic windows of opportunity to do so: May 2001-January 2003 and Jan. 2007-Now.  There were and are reasons to be hesitant about that kind of change in those time periods unrelated to fear of a Bush veto, anti-gay prejudice or political backlash.  Moreover, any version of the MREA is dead without a Democratic president.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama (the only other male senator still running in the Dem primaries). I make no representations on his record on gay rights; I would simply note that he is not associated with the triangulation strategy that resulted in DOMA.  Personally, gay rights is low on my totem pole of issues at this juncture.  He has a tendency to interject pro-gay statements in unusual settings and his past work in civil rights indicates he will be very careful about his judicial nominees.    </p>
<p> Of course, all that being said, Obama is no libertarian and you are unlikely to support him.  I was making a comment about the interest gay Democratic voters have in him, and lingering suspicions from the Clinton era.</p>
<p> As an aside, although I will not be voting for Clinton in the primary, I will be supporting her if she is the Democratic nominee.  The fact that Clinton has not sponsored legislation to repeal DODT is not something I am especially concerned about.  There were only two realistic windows of opportunity to do so: May 2001-January 2003 and Jan. 2007-Now.  There were and are reasons to be hesitant about that kind of change in those time periods unrelated to fear of a Bush veto, anti-gay prejudice or political backlash.  Moreover, any version of the MREA is dead without a Democratic president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck H</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/comment-page-1/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=3912#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>Alex: Him who?  Are you saying one of the male senators running has sponsored a companion version of MREA in the Senate?  To the best of my knowledge none of the senators running has given anything but lip service to ending DADT.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex: Him who?  Are you saying one of the male senators running has sponsored a companion version of MREA in the Senate?  To the best of my knowledge none of the senators running has given anything but lip service to ending DADT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/02/they-keep-forgetting-so-i-keep-reminding/comment-page-1/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=3912#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>Gay Democrats have not overlooked this.  There is a surge of support for him in the gay community.  This is not the reason I&#039;m voting for him, but I am sure younger gay Democrats in particular are taking these things into account.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gay Democrats have not overlooked this.  There is a surge of support for him in the gay community.  This is not the reason I'm voting for him, but I am sure younger gay Democrats in particular are taking these things into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

