<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Constitution Count as a &quot;Legitimate Reason&quot;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/does-the-constitution-count-as-a-legitimate-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/does-the-constitution-count-as-a-legitimate-reason/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/does-the-constitution-count-as-a-legitimate-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-6279</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=4208#comment-6279</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t particularly like sobriety checkpoints (upheld, wrongly in my view, in &lt;i&gt;Michigan v. Sitz&lt;/i&gt;, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)), but they can be distinguished from &lt;i&gt;Edmond&lt;/i&gt; (and this story) in that someone who is nabbed for DUI in fact committed a crime -- past tense. &lt;i&gt;Edmond&lt;/i&gt; and this story are about preventing hypothetical future crime. That is a huge distinction, especially where crafting out a Fourth Amendment exception is concerned.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't particularly like sobriety checkpoints (upheld, wrongly in my view, in <i>Michigan v. Sitz</i>, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)), but they can be distinguished from <i>Edmond</i> (and this story) in that someone who is nabbed for DUI in fact committed a crime &#8212; past tense. <i>Edmond</i> and this story are about preventing hypothetical future crime. That is a huge distinction, especially where crafting out a Fourth Amendment exception is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alteredcarbon</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/does-the-constitution-count-as-a-legitimate-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>alteredcarbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=4208#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>Speaking of vehicular checkpoints, wouldn&#039;t the same 2 cases apply to the many checkpoints that are setup across the country -particularly back east in small, towns- for the purpose of stopping traffic to check for DUI?  Curious as to what is your thought on this matter?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of vehicular checkpoints, wouldn't the same 2 cases apply to the many checkpoints that are setup across the country -particularly back east in small, towns- for the purpose of stopping traffic to check for DUI?  Curious as to what is your thought on this matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

