Amazon.com Widgets A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine … But Haste Makes Waste

A collection of real-world libertarian, individualist and laissez-faire rants on law, economics, politics, culture and other current events
by an average, everyday lawyer & investment banker and part-time pop scholar.


A Stitch in Haste header image 4

Questions

June 27th, 2008 · 5 Comments

–Is it a proper function of government to criminalize male public shirtlessness? (Via QuizLaw.)

–Special Follow-Up Question: Any hard-core libertarians want to take up the topic of female public shirtlessness and gender-based discrimination between the two?

–Does James Dobson speak for you?

–Who says the dollar is weak?

–Which aspect of the U.S. Naval Academy is more bizarre: compulsory prayers or compulsory tomfoolery?

–Who said this, and in what context?

So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated.

Tags: Questions


Related Posts
(Automatically Generated)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/questions-111/trackback/



--> Return to Main Page <--

5 responses so far ↓

  • Link David Z // Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Funny thing is, lots of people want to see topless women, few people want to see topless men. The former is generally prohibited, while the latter isn't…

  • Link dolphin // Jun 27, 2008 at 12:04 pm

    The day they ban shirtless men in this country is the day I head to Canada (jk, maybe…).

  • Link Michael K // Jun 27, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    The letter he wrote is just a riot! And it was around that time that I gave up on them and installed Suse. The new laptop is on Ubuntu. The blog is on Google. And the TiVo is on Linux.

  • Link Dolphin’s Dock » Blog Archive » Topless // Jun 27, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    [...] (Hat Tip: Kip Esquire) [...]

  • Link Terrence Watson // Jun 27, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Funny thing about Canada…

    It's not a very libertarian-friendly place, but the Court did rule a while back that the law could not discriminate with regards to male/female toplessness. In Ontario, anyway, I'm not sure about other jurisdictions, female toplessness is legal.

    But I never saw anyone, uh, take advantage of that ruling. Why do women so squander their freedom? :-) .

    Best,
    Terrence