Amazon.com Widgets A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine … But Haste Makes Waste

A collection of real-world libertarian, individualist and laissez-faire rants on law, economics, politics, culture and other current events
by an average, everyday lawyer & investment banker and part-time pop scholar.


A Stitch in Haste header image 4

Where "Get Out of the Marriage Business" is Correct

June 5th, 2008 · 4 Comments

To review: One of the most embarrassing forest-trees error that libertarians can make is to argue that, since “government should get out of the marriage business” (a dubious proposition in and of itself), then it must follow that libertarians should oppose gay marriage, because at least that way somebody isn’t getting married, which (the argument goes) advances the (allegedly) libertarian end-goal of abolishing marriage as a legal status altogether.

It’s a mind-bogglingly stupid (not to mention cruel) argument — one that not only ignores reality but also ignores theory: Since when is equal protection (writ large, very large) acceptable collateral damage in the libertarian war on governmental meddling (writ small, very small)?

On the other hand, and for the sake of perspective, here’s an instance where I think all libertarians can indeed agree: Government should definitely get out of this part of the marriage business —

The [Kern County, California] office will issue same-sex marriage licenses beginning June 17 as state law requires but will stop solemnizing weddings due to lack of staff and space, Auditor-Controller-County Clerk Ann Barnett announced in a news release Wednesday evening.

Julie Poochigian, chief deputy clerk-recorder of Tulare County, said her office plans to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples starting June 17. She said the office has never performed wedding ceremonies for couples.

“Some other counties do that, but Tulare County does not,” she said. “We are not staffed to perform the services.”

I simply do not see how it is a proper function of government to provide a wedding ceremony, any more than it would be a proper function of government to provide a wedding gown or a tuxedo. The only requirement is fair and equal treatment in the issuance and recognition of marriage licenses.

By contrast, recall that this is utterly unacceptable:

San Diego County plans to comply with a state Supreme Court ruling that allows same-sex marriages but will not force employees to perform the ceremonies if they cite religious or moral objections.

County Assessor-Recorder-Clerk Greg Smith, whose office issues marriage licenses, said he has informed the roughly 115 employees deputized to conduct ceremonies to tell him if they object to same-sex marriages.

It’s quite simple really: If your taxpayer-funded job requires you to treat all comers fairly and equally, but your bigotry religion prevents you from doing so, then quit. That’s the only “reasonable accommodation” you’re entitled to. (Compare to my previous posts on when private pharmacists object to dispensing contraception.)

(Via Good As You, who is a bit more cynical about the county clerk’s motivations.)

Speaking of Kern County and gay marriage: Be sure not to drink the carrot juice.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This

Tags: Constitutional Issues · Gay Rights and Issues · Libertarianism · Society, Religion, Culture Wars


Related Posts
(Automatically Generated)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/06/where-get-out-of-the-marriage-business-is-correct/trackback/



--> Return to Main Page <--

4 responses so far ↓

  • Link Chuck // Jun 5, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    I was surprised doing research the last few weeks how many counties here either don't do civil marriages or have sharply limited the hours due to budget constraints.

  • Link Mark // Jun 6, 2008 at 8:28 am

    What "libertarians" are actually making that argument? Not being facetious, I would just like to know who is that idiotic.

  • Link KipEsquire // Jun 6, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Mark, peruse the comments in any Hit &Run post on the topic of gay marriage and you'll find plenty of that sort of argument. See also my posts on ENDA and adding sexual orientation to hate crimes laws.

  • Link G-A-Y // Jun 6, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    Hey buddy. Just wanted to make sure you had seen the latest on the Kern County situation:

    Kern followup

    I actually don't think I was all that cynical at the beginning, just asking readers to weigh in on whether or not Barnett was telling the truth about space and staff limitation. But as more has been revealed (esp. her reaching out to the Alliance Defense Fund), it certainly seems like bias was the impetus.

Leave a Comment

(Comments containing links are held for moderation.)

(You can use most common HTML tags.)