Amazon.com Widgets A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine … But Haste Makes Waste

A collection of real-world libertarian, individualist and laissez-faire rants on law, economics, politics, culture and other current events
by an average, everyday lawyer & investment banker and part-time pop scholar.


A Stitch in Haste header image 4

New York Times Devotes 3,233 Words to Defending an Idiot

July 20th, 2008 · 5 Comments

I have no doubt that Ms. Diane McLeod — the subject of this voluminous piece by perpetual anti-Wall-Street malcontent Gretchen Morgenson on the supposed “debt crisis” in America — is a sweet, charming, peaceful woman who would pose no threat to anyone, especially intentionally. And we may, at least to an extent, sympathize with her current financial plight:

Nevertheless, may we please simultaneously acknowledge that Ms. McLeod is, quite frankly, a moron:

–”For a little quiet, Diane McLeod stashes her phone in the dishwasher.”

–”Ms. McLeod, who is 47, readily admits her money problems are largely of her own making.”

–”Ms. McLeod … was fired from her job in March for writing inappropriate e-mail messages.”

–”When the marriage began to founder, she said, she shopped to make herself feel better.”

–”There was an $8,000 penalty to pay off the previous mortgage early as well as roughly $1,500 in closing costs on the new loan. To cover these fees, Ms. McLeod dipped into her retirement account. Only later did she realize that she had to pay an early-withdrawal penalty of $3,000 to the Internal Revenue Service. Short on cash, she put it on a credit card.”

–”Although she was making $50,000 a year working two jobs, her income was not enough to support the new $165,000 loan. She asked her son to join her on the loan application; with his income, the numbers worked. … The decision would drive a wedge between mother and son and damage his credit profile as well.”

–”She does not want another credit card, she said. But even though her credit profile is ruined, she still receives come-ons. Recently an envelope arrived offering a ‘pre-qualified’ Salute Visa Gold card issued by Urban Bank Trust. ‘We think you deserve more credit!’ it said in bold type.” (Note: I will unhesitatingly concede that Salute Visa is a predatory business that charges obscene fees for credit cards with puny limits. It is a vile enterprise and an embarrassment to every defender of capitalism. Of course, I know this because I spent five seconds on a two-word Google search that provided me with all the information I needed to discern Salute Visa’s true nature. So what’s Ms. McLeod’s excuse?)

–Finally:

Can still afford cigarettes...

Can still afford cigarettes…

Ms. McLeod also was subject to some major exogenous setbacks (e.g., medical emergencies and a death in the family) that were certainly not her fault. But everyone suffers such unexpected circumstances at one point or another. That’s why we save (and have insurance).

My point is not to mock Ms. McLeod. My point is only to remind malcontents such as Ms. Morgenson and her target audience that, just as we do not dumb down television, movies and the Internet simply because children might be exposed to it (no matter how much some theocrats and other radical conservatives would like us to), neither is it appropriate to “dumb down” the economy for fear that a Diane McLeod might overextend herself on too expensive a house and too many handbags.

I was recently describing to a friend a classic old case from law school: Vaughan v. Menlove. The facts are not as important as the holding: Stupidity, even innocent stupidity, does not excuse one from personal responsibility. If you’re stupid and you know it, then you have the duty, if not to be smart, then at least acknowledge that your stupidity is your problem and not your neighbors’.

We must not be tempted, or allow activist legislators to be tempted, to re-engineer the entire financial sector, thereby constraining the competent, in order to protect the incompetent. Prosecuting outright fraud by banks and mortgage lenders is one thing. Disclosure laws are one thing. But forbidding transactions altogether (or, worse, “punishing” innocent firms for innocent conduct) crosses a line.

Just something to keep in mind as more “exposés” are published denouncing “capitalism run amok” or “big bad bankers” or whatever.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Tags: Capitalism


Related Posts
(Automatically Generated)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/07/new-york-times-devotes-3233-words-to-defending-an-idiot/trackback/



--> Return to Main Page <--

5 responses so far ↓

  • Link Jeff // Jul 20, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    I'd point out also that the big bad bankers haven't exactly taken the money and run, here, either. Citigroup just reported a $2.5 billion loss for the second quarter, Countrywide had to put itself up for sale, IndyMac bank was just taken over by the FDIC, and trading of National City's stock was halted on the NYSE after the value fell 30% in one day.

    What's bad for borrowers is often bad for lenders, too.

  • Link Brad // Jul 20, 2008 at 11:25 pm

    The most egregious part f this whole scenario is getting her son, with his income, to sign on a home that she could not afford.

  • Link J. Philip // Jul 21, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    The Times LOVES to dig up an absolute moron and cast them as victims of the vast conspiracy of capitalism when their worst enemy is their own poor judgment.

  • Link gvb // Jul 21, 2008 at 3:40 pm

    'Morons' are exactly the people you need to protect. By definition, nobody else needs protection.

    While we're at it, let's only educate our own children, give medical advice to only the healthy, and eliminate all taxes so that people can just pay for whatever they're using. That way, nobody is accountable for anyone else. Awesome!

  • Link deRuiter // Jul 22, 2008 at 6:06 am

    Thank you for pointing out succinctly that this woman brought this debt on herself! Ms. McLeod epitomizes self indulgent behavior run amok. She admits over and over that she spent money foolishly on things she didn't need. As an owner of rental proptery who has evicted over 150 families for non payment of rent, it is NEVER lack of money. It is ALWAYS the inability to spend / save wisely. People like Ms. McLeod REFUSE to prioritize spending correctly, this is their problem. "I want it, I'll buy it now and worry about paying later." From that photo one can see that she could save money by quitting smoking and limiting grocery intake. The New York Times is at it again, "World to end tomorrow, all will die, women, children, minorities hardest hit."