<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Planned Parenthood Violating its Tax-Exempt Status?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/is-planned-parenthood-violating-its-tax-exempt-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/is-planned-parenthood-violating-its-tax-exempt-status/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Calls to Revoke LDS&#8217; Tax-Exempt Status</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/is-planned-parenthood-violating-its-tax-exempt-status/comment-page-1/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator>On Calls to Revoke LDS&#8217; Tax-Exempt Status</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=5632#comment-7841</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211;Is Planned Parenthood Violating its Tax-Exempt Status? &#8211;CRS Recommendation: Political Activity by Tax-Exempt Institutions &#8211;Theocrat Clerics to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211;Is Planned Parenthood Violating its Tax-Exempt Status? &#8211;CRS Recommendation: Political Activity by Tax-Exempt Institutions &#8211;Theocrat Clerics to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/is-planned-parenthood-violating-its-tax-exempt-status/comment-page-1/#comment-7127</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=5632#comment-7127</guid>
		<description>“Help Keep Politics Out of the Exam Room!”

It&#039;s interesting to think that most of PP&#039;s supporters (and possibly PP itself) support socialized medicine, which brings politics into every facet of medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Help Keep Politics Out of the Exam Room!”</p>
<p>It's interesting to think that most of PP's supporters (and possibly PP itself) support socialized medicine, which brings politics into every facet of medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolphin</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/is-planned-parenthood-violating-its-tax-exempt-status/comment-page-1/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>dolphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=5632#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>From a design standpoint, the line break and color change should be between &quot;Yourself&quot; and &quot;From&quot; not &quot;From&quot; and &quot;John.&quot;  &quot;From&quot; is associated more dominantly with the name &quot;John McCain&quot; than &quot;Protect Yourself&quot; in this context.  Too many designers these days forget that design is first and for most about presenting a message, not simply making something that looks pretty at a glance.

On an unrelated note, I hope I&#039;m never in a situation in which I need a condom to protect myself from John McCain (yuck).  It&#039;s a clever idea, but if I&#039;m using a condom, I&#039;d prefer if John McCain (or for that matter Barrack Obama) were the furthest things from my mind ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a design standpoint, the line break and color change should be between "Yourself" and "From" not "From" and "John."  "From" is associated more dominantly with the name "John McCain" than "Protect Yourself" in this context.  Too many designers these days forget that design is first and for most about presenting a message, not simply making something that looks pretty at a glance.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, I hope I'm never in a situation in which I need a condom to protect myself from John McCain (yuck).  It's a clever idea, but if I'm using a condom, I'd prefer if John McCain (or for that matter Barrack Obama) were the furthest things from my mind <img src='http://www.kipesquire.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

