<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Laptop Searches and Seizures at the Border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/on-laptop-searches-and-seizures-at-the-border/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/on-laptop-searches-and-seizures-at-the-border/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:23:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Border Search&#8221; Policy Should Not Rest with Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/on-laptop-searches-and-seizures-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Border Search&#8221; Policy Should Not Rest with Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=4925#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>[...] Kip    &#183; No Comments  To review: Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have crafted a plenary &#8220;border exception&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kip    &middot; No Comments  To review: Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have crafted a plenary "border exception" [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/on-laptop-searches-and-seizures-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=4925#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I was thinking.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's what I was thinking.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/08/on-laptop-searches-and-seizures-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-6775</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=4925#comment-6775</guid>
		<description>Is there a difference between U.S. citizens and non-citizens in this overall scenario?  I&#039;m assuming there is not a recognized difference.  I think I&#039;m really asking whether or not the libertarian position would reflect any difference, or if the general notion is that the focus must be on the government&#039;s powers first.  The Fourth Amendment says what it says, limiting powers in a specific way.

&lt;em&gt;[Kip replies: No difference -- the border is the border. Of course, the Fourth Amendment also does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens either.]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a difference between U.S. citizens and non-citizens in this overall scenario?  I'm assuming there is not a recognized difference.  I think I'm really asking whether or not the libertarian position would reflect any difference, or if the general notion is that the focus must be on the government's powers first.  The Fourth Amendment says what it says, limiting powers in a specific way.</p>
<p><em>[Kip replies: No difference -- the border is the border. Of course, the Fourth Amendment also does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens either.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
