Comments on: From "Obama v. McCain" to "Obama v. Social Security" http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/10/from-obama-v-mccain-to-obama-v-social-security/ A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bob Smith http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/10/from-obama-v-mccain-to-obama-v-social-security/comment-page-1/#comment-7791 Bob Smith Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:54:47 +0000 http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=6678#comment-7791 Obama is an idiot, but the people who elected him think he's going to change the world remarkably. I will enjoy watching the dashing of all that hope in the next few months. Perhaps Jessie Jackson will be the next Secretary of State! ("Hope, not dope!"). Obama is an idiot, but the people who elected him think he's going to change the world remarkably. I will enjoy watching the dashing of all that hope in the next few months.

Perhaps Jessie Jackson will be the next Secretary of State! ("Hope, not dope!").

]]> By: Obama Continues to Ignore His Own “Donut Hole” Plan (and Its Flaws) http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/10/from-obama-v-mccain-to-obama-v-social-security/comment-page-1/#comment-7747 Obama Continues to Ignore His Own “Donut Hole” Plan (and Its Flaws) Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:04:04 +0000 http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=6678#comment-7747 [...] From "Obama v. McCain" to "Obama v. Social Security"10.22 [...] [...] From "Obama v. McCain" to "Obama v. Social Security"10.22 [...]

]]> By: David Z http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/10/from-obama-v-mccain-to-obama-v-social-security/comment-page-1/#comment-7697 David Z Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:43:04 +0000 http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=6678#comment-7697 "He believes that one strong option to improve Social Security's long-term solvency is asking people who earn more than $250,000 to pay a little more into the system." LOLZ. I know you already beat me to the punch on this one, but really? "Asking"? and, "A little more"? It's voluntary, you see... "He believes that one strong option to improve Social Security's long-term solvency is asking people who earn more than $250,000 to pay a little more into the system."

LOLZ. I know you already beat me to the punch on this one, but really? "Asking"? and, "A little more"?

It's voluntary, you see…

]]>