<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tie Goes to Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/a-tie-goes-to-whom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/a-tie-goes-to-whom/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #190 - Bill of Rights Day &#171; The Legal Satyricon</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/a-tie-goes-to-whom/comment-page-1/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #190 - Bill of Rights Day &#171; The Legal Satyricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=7616#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>[...] of the under-rated Ninth Amendment, is sadly lacking; notwithstanding  KipEsquire’s valiant attempt(s) to revive discussion of the Ninth’s specific and uninhibited reservation of “unenumerated” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the under-rated Ninth Amendment, is sadly lacking; notwithstanding  KipEsquire’s valiant attempt(s) to revive discussion of the Ninth’s specific and uninhibited reservation of “unenumerated” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

