<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney Was For Detroit Before He Was Against It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/mitt-romney-was-for-detroit-before-he-was-against-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/mitt-romney-was-for-detroit-before-he-was-against-it/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2008/11/mitt-romney-was-for-detroit-before-he-was-against-it/comment-page-1/#comment-7950</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=7463#comment-7950</guid>
		<description>No offense, Kip, but I think your limits of understanding the US auto industry are showing here.

It&#039;s OK -- most people who haven&#039;t worked in it don&#039;t understand it.

Simply put, MOST of the US auto industry is suppliers, with the Detroit 3 making up the rest.

Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc. aren&#039;t really &quot;part of the industry,&quot; since they&#039;re neither US-based companies, nor particularly integrated into the design economy and management economy here.

Even if you accept the specious notion that anybody who has a factory in another country is now part of that country&#039;s industry, there&#039;s another troublesome component -- without Chrysler, Ford and GM manufacturing cars here, most of the suppliers who also supply Toyota, Honda, BMW, Mercedes and Nissan will go under.  That will mean the cessation of most auto production in the US -- including at the Japanese and German factories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, Kip, but I think your limits of understanding the US auto industry are showing here.</p>
<p>It's OK &#8212; most people who haven't worked in it don't understand it.</p>
<p>Simply put, MOST of the US auto industry is suppliers, with the Detroit 3 making up the rest.</p>
<p>Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc. aren't really "part of the industry," since they're neither US-based companies, nor particularly integrated into the design economy and management economy here.</p>
<p>Even if you accept the specious notion that anybody who has a factory in another country is now part of that country's industry, there's another troublesome component &#8212; without Chrysler, Ford and GM manufacturing cars here, most of the suppliers who also supply Toyota, Honda, BMW, Mercedes and Nissan will go under.  That will mean the cessation of most auto production in the US &#8212; including at the Japanese and German factories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

