<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Bangs and Whimpers of the Prop 8 Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kipesquire.net/2009/05/on-the-bangs-and-whimpers-of-the-prop-8-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2009/05/on-the-bangs-and-whimpers-of-the-prop-8-decision/</link>
	<description>A Stitch in Time Saves Nine ... But Haste Makes Waste</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaysays</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2009/05/on-the-bangs-and-whimpers-of-the-prop-8-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-8698</link>
		<dc:creator>jaysays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=11022#comment-8698</guid>
		<description>I recently wrote about the federal challenges and attempted to ignore the fact that the Fed. Courts are likely going to find a way out of being labeled &quot;activist judges&quot; in spite of the fact that Romer is, as you say, on point.  Putting the ideology of the court aside, I still think it is better to fight that fight than not.  We cannot be afraid of what the Fed Courts may do considering it&#039;s all already being done to us.  If they rule outside of the law, let history be their judges as it surely will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote about the federal challenges and attempted to ignore the fact that the Fed. Courts are likely going to find a way out of being labeled "activist judges" in spite of the fact that Romer is, as you say, on point.  Putting the ideology of the court aside, I still think it is better to fight that fight than not.  We cannot be afraid of what the Fed Courts may do considering it's all already being done to us.  If they rule outside of the law, let history be their judges as it surely will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.kipesquire.net/2009/05/on-the-bangs-and-whimpers-of-the-prop-8-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-8683</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kipesquire.net/?p=11022#comment-8683</guid>
		<description>The federal case  will be interesting to learn whether people understand that &quot;too much, too soon&quot; and &quot;know thy enemy&quot; aren&#039;t the same. As you say the federal reasoning is clear, but the federal courts as currntly populated may be too full of cowards (and/or hypocrites).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal case  will be interesting to learn whether people understand that "too much, too soon" and "know thy enemy" aren't the same. As you say the federal reasoning is clear, but the federal courts as currntly populated may be too full of cowards (and/or hypocrites).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

